Why Thailand is leaning towards China now?

-

Thailand’s tilt toward China is less a sudden “switch” and more a pragmatic recalibration shaped by politics, security needs, and regional realities. Several factors come together:

1. Fallout from the 2014 military coup

After the 2014 coup, the United States downgraded relations, suspended some military assistance, and publicly criticized Thailand’s political direction. For Bangkok—especially the military—this was read as conditional and unreliable support.
China, by contrast, did not criticize the coup and continued engagement without political conditions. That made Beijing an attractive alternative partner.

2. Defense diversification and fewer strings attached

Thailand deliberately moved to diversify its arms suppliers:

  • Chinese weapons were cheaper, delivered faster, and came with no democracy or human-rights conditions.
  • This suited a military-led or military-influenced government.
  • Cooperation expanded beyond purchases into joint exercises, training, and arms production.

This does not mean Thailand abandoned the U.S.—it still uses U.S. systems and participates in Cobra Gold—but it no longer wants dependence on one supplier.

3. No direct territorial conflict with China

Unlike Vietnam or the Philippines, Thailand has no maritime or territorial disputes with China.
This removes a major source of friction and allows Bangkok to engage China largely on economic and military-technical terms, without public backlash over sovereignty.

4. Economic gravity and regional integration

China is:

  • One of Thailand’s largest trading partners
  • A key investor in infrastructure, rail, energy, and tourism
  • Central to regional supply chains

For Thai policymakers, aligning too strongly against China would risk economic self-harm.

5. Hedging, not choosing sides

Thailand’s core strategy is hedging:

  • Keep the U.S. alliance alive (training, interoperability, legitimacy)
  • Deepen ties with China (arms, investment, diplomatic cover)
  • Preserve strategic autonomy

From Bangkok’s perspective, this is rational survival in a multipolar world—not ideological alignment.

6. U.S. concerns and alliance strain

Washington worries about:

  • Interoperability problems if Chinese systems mix with U.S. ones
  • Access to Thai bases in a future regional conflict
  • Thailand drifting from being a “treaty ally” to a “neutral balancer”

These concerns, when expressed publicly or punitively, can ironically push Thailand further toward China.

Bottom line

Thailand is not “pro-China” in the way some countries are. It is pro-Thailand:

  • Reducing dependence on any single power
  • Avoiding moral conditionality
  • Maximizing room to maneuver

The shift reflects loss of trust after 2014, China’s non-interference approach, and Southeast Asia’s broader move toward strategic balancing rather than bloc loyalty.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manipur Should be a Vital Gateway of Southeast Asia to India. Explaining Why?

-
Manipur, a state in Northeast India, is strategically positioned to serve as a vital gateway for Southeast Asia to India due to its unique geographical, cultural, and economic advantages. Below are the key reasons, explained concisely: 1. Geographical Proximity: Manipur shares a 398-km international border with Myanmar, a Southeast Asian nation. This makes it a natural entry point for trade and connectivity with countries like Thailand, Laos, and beyond, via Myanmar. 2. Act East Policy: India’s Act East Policy aims to strengthen ties with Southeast Asia. Manipur’s location makes it a critical hub for implementing this policy, facilitating cross-border trade, investment, and infrastructure projects like the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway. 3. Trade Potential: Manipur’s border town, Moreh, is a key trading point with Myanmar. The Integrated Check Post (ICP) at Moreh enhances trade efficiency, enabling goods from Southeast Asia to enter India and vice versa, boosting economic ti...
Read more

The Myth of the "Lost Land": Challenging the Narrative of the Cambodia-Thailand Border Conflict

-
Image
The prevailing narrative surrounding the Cambodia-Thailand border—often steeped in rhetoric of "lost land" and the specter of "foreign invasion"—is fundamentally a myth, one largely disconnected from the reality experienced by the communities living along the frontier. The facts on the ground starkly contradict the impassioned claims made by extremist nationalist voices from the capitals of Bangkok and Phnom Penh: The Land is Not Lost: The territories in question have not vanished. They are physically present, and the long-established pattern of life along the border continues unabated. No Foreign Invasion: The notion of an invading force is unsupported by the daily reality of cross-border existence. The border is, in practice, a ubiquitous, permeable line of engagement, not a fortified front. A History of Cooperation, Not Conflict For generations, the people living along the Cambodia-Thailand border have maintained a pragmatic and mutually beneficial re...
Read more

The Man Who Dared to Make Peace

-
Image
A Reflection on Courage Beyond Convention Published by PeaceWorks Forum, October 2025 In a world often defined by power, secrecy, and political maneuvering, peace rarely emerges from the corridors of authority alone. Sometimes, it begins with one person—someone willing to cross boundaries, challenge expectations, and take action where others remain silent. This is the story of a man who dared to make peace—not through titles or treaties, but through courage, conviction, and the refusal to accept endless conflict as destiny. When Borders Burn and Hope Falters Few conflicts have tested the resolve of Southeast Asia like the Cambodia–Thailand border dispute, especially around the sacred Preah Vihear Temple. Perched high on the Dângrêk Mountains, this centuries-old Hindu sanctuary has been a symbol of pride, pain, and identity for both nations—its beauty shadowed by bullets and barbed wire. Over the decades, the site has witnessed military skirmishes, nationalist fervor, and intern...
Read more